WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-ia64-devel

RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] fully virtualize psr and ipsr on non-VTIdom

To: "Xu, Anthony" <anthony.xu@xxxxxxxxx>, "Magenheimer, Dan \(HP Labs Fort Collins\)" <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] fully virtualize psr and ipsr on non-VTIdomain
From: "Xu, Anthony" <anthony.xu@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 17:35:40 +0800
Cc: xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 09:35:29 +0000
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Discussion of the ia64 port of Xen <xen-ia64-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ia64-devel>, <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ia64-devel>, <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcXzytgKo6So03GTShmzfLz5ceuCSgBxm7Vw
Thread-topic: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] fully virtualize psr and ipsr on non-VTIdomain
Dan,

What's your opinion about this patch?

Thanks
-Anthony

>-----Original Message-----
>From: xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>[mailto:xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Xu, Anthony
>Sent: 2005年11月28日 11:22
>To: Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
>Cc: xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] fully virtualize psr and ipsr on
>non-VTIdomain
>
>Dan,
>This patch is intended to fully virtualize psr and ipsr on non-VTI
>domain.
>Following things are done in this patch.
>1, previously when guest reads psr, it always get psr dt rt it equal to
>1. that is because HV doesn't restore these information,
>metaphysical_mode can't present all these information. I save these
>information into privregs->vpsr. Thus guest can get correct information
>about dt, rt and it.
>2, when guest reads psr, we should only return low 32bits and 35 and 36
>bits, previously return all bits.
>3, when guest rsm and ssm psr, HV rsm and ssm some bits of current psr
>which is used by HV, that is not correct, guest rsm and ssm should only
>impact guest psr(that is regs->ipsr).
>4, mistakenly uses guest DCR, guest DCR should impact guest psr when
>injecting interruption into guest, but not impact guest ipsr.
>When injecting interruption into guest,The current implementation is
>       Guest ipsr.be=guest dcr.be
>       Guest ipsr.pp=guest dcr.pp
>Correct implementation should be,
>       Guest psr.be=guest dcr.be
>       Guest psr.pp=guest dcr.pp.
>
>Because of above modifications, I turn off FAST_RFI, FAST_BREAK and
>FAST_ACCESS_REFLECT.
>
>Signed-off-by Anthony Xu < anthony.xu@xxxxxxxxx>
>
>One question, why do we need to virtualize guest psr.pp and always set
>guest psr.pp to 1?
>
>Thanks
>-Anthony
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>