This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Home Products Support Community News


RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [Patch] tools build patch for gcc3.4

To: <takebe_akio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [Patch] tools build patch for gcc3.4
From: "Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)" <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 06:20:53 -0800
Delivery-date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 14:21:21 +0000
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Discussion of the ia64 port of Xen <xen-ia64-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ia64-devel>, <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ia64-devel>, <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcXre6OZKEg3JkAaR/GHi14bBhxqMAABhQ/w
Thread-topic: [Xen-ia64-devel] [Patch] tools build patch for gcc3.4
Is there a cleaner way of doing this?   This is a common
file (shared with Xen/x86) and I don't think Keir will like
this patch.  Why is __ASSEMBLY__ turned on?  (it should only
be turned on when compiling assembly code)  And why do
__IA64_UL and __IA64_UL_CONST need to be redefined?


> -----Original Message-----
> From: xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf 
> Of takebe_akio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2005 6:33 AM
> To: xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [Xen-ia64-devel] [Patch] tools build patch for gcc3.4
> Hi,
> I and Kanno made a tools build patch for gcc3.4.
> I test it work on RHEL4 and Xen.
> I confirmed to be able to compile tools on RHEL3,
> but still don't test it works on RHEL3 and Xen.
> Signed-off-by Akio Takabe <takebe_akio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by Masaki Kanno <kanno.masaki@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Best Regards,
> Akio Takebe 

Xen-ia64-devel mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>