|  |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
 
  |   |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
  
    |   xen-ia64-devel
RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] domU stability 
| To: | "Magenheimer, Dan \(HP Labs Fort Collins\)" <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxx>,	"Tristan Gingold" <Tristan.Gingold@xxxxxxxx>,	<xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,	"Chapman, Matthew \(HP Labs\)" <matthewc@xxxxxx> |  
| Subject: | RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] domU stability |  
| From: | "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx> |  
| Date: | Tue, 15 Nov 2005 23:19:21 +0800 |  
| Delivery-date: | Tue, 15 Nov 2005 15:20:58 +0000 |  
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |  
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |  
| List-id: | Discussion of the ia64 port of Xen	<xen-ia64-devel.lists.xensource.com> |  
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com> |  
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ia64-devel>,	<mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |  
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ia64-devel>,	<mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |  
| Sender: | xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |  
| Thread-index: | AcXpxNUIksZy/2HIQ2OtS60lk0WIzgAAA1IgAAuZ4eAAAPs0oA== |  
| Thread-topic: | [Xen-ia64-devel] domU stability |  
| >From: Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins) [mailto:dan.magenheimer@xxxxxx]
>Sent: 2005年11月15日 22:50
>> >From: Tristan Gingold
>> >
>> >I am trying xen-ia64-unstable.hg using changeset 7729.  Dom0
>> works well.
>> >However, domU seems pretty unstable: I got a lot of bad mpa:
>> >However, I was able to log on domU (after many tries).
>> >Has any of you the same errors or is it ok ?
>>
>> Hi, Tristan,
>>      That warning is harmless, and currently the grant table
>> pfn is hard code at 0x10000000000 in guest physical, which is
>> out of normal guest memory range. When be/fe driver
>> communicates, grant table entries are touched and then you
>> saw above warnings.
>
>They do not seem to cause any problems but
>I'm not entirely sure they are harmless.  I think these addresses
>are domU grant table entries that should be translated to
>virtual addresses and shouldn't find their way to
>translate_domain_pte.
Don't know what you mean. What I saw is, guest tried to access identity mapped 
virtual address by 0xe00001000... (grant table entries), which page fault and 
hit in vcpu_translate and then go to translate_domain_pte for out-of-range 
guest physical address 0x1000... and finally warning.
We may need to find better way to do that anyway.
Thanks,
Kevin
_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
 | 
 |  | 
  
    |  |  |