[Xen-ia64-devel] why sedf won't work on Xen/ia64
I spent some time looking into why sedf won't work on
Xen/ia64. I was able to understand the symptoms but
I don't have a fix. Since I may not get back to working
on it (at least for awhile), I wanted to post my
status so others don't have to reproduce my research.
(Tristan, it appears to me that this will directly affect
the SMP implementation so this might be something worth
looking into while you are waiting for multiple domains
and virtual I/O to work solidly.)
When bvt was the default scheduler, Xen/ia64 seemed to
work fine, even for (limited-functionality) multiple
domains. In July(?), the core xen team switched the default
scheduler to sedf; Xen/ia64 with sedf crashes early
and mysteriously. As a result, in order to run Xen/ia64,
it is necessary to specify "sched=bvt" on the command
line. This is easily forgotten and is also one more
annoying thing to explain to new users/developers.
(And I can't find a way to pass the option on ski, which
I sometimes use for debugging, so I instead have to
manually change common/schedule.c.)
When running bvt, the idle domain ("idle") never gets
scheduled. When running sedf, idle gets scheduled often.
(I consider this a bug in sedf or at least in the
default parameters for it.)
Idle is not a real domain... no "guest" or "user" code
is run when idle is scheduled.
When idle is run repeatedly, the stack pointer quickly
goes down in value until the stack overruns other data.
This results in bizarre errors.
After idle is scheduled and started by context_switch,
a timer interrupt often happens immediately when
__enter_scheduler (after returning from context_switch)
When idle is scheduled alternately with domain0, no
stack changes occurs. However, if a timer interrupt
is processed while idle is active, a "stack activation
record" gets created that NEVER gets unwound. Thus
eventually (and fairly randomly), idle's stack overruns
If idle doesn't work "properly", domain0 must run on
all processors in an SMP. So unless we implement
"Xen SMP" and "guest SMP" concurrently, this problem
will need to be fixed for Xen SMP to run.
TBD. It may be possible to find/leverage some
Xen/x86 code but we need to ensure that we minimize "full
context switches" to idle as they are much more
expensive on ia64 than on x86.
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
|<Prev in Thread]
||[Next in Thread>|
- [Xen-ia64-devel] why sedf won't work on Xen/ia64,
Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins) <=