|  |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
 
  |   |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
  
    |   xen-ia64-devel
[Xen-ia64-devel] RE: Timer  merge 
| Dan:
        Thanks, we will send out a patch soon for review with 1: guest
ITC (delta) /ITM keep in shared page, 2: fast hypercall for TPR,EOI,
IVR, 3: ac_timer own machine ITM, 4: short route for guest to set ITM.
        Eddie.
> 
> So Xen/x86 delivers every timer tick to every Linux domain?
> That seems like a potential performance problem!
Yes, the overhead spent on IA32 timer is much higher than IA64. 
Perhaps Linux tickless patch is a better solution.
_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
 | 
 
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |  | 
[Xen-ia64-devel] RE: Timer  merge, Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
[Xen-ia64-devel] RE: Timer  merge, Tian, Kevin
[Xen-ia64-devel] RE: Timer  merge, Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
[Xen-ia64-devel] RE: Timer  merge, Dong, Eddie
[Xen-ia64-devel] RE: Timer  merge, Tian, Kevin
[Xen-ia64-devel] RE: Timer  merge, Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
[Xen-ia64-devel] RE: Timer  merge, Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
[Xen-ia64-devel] RE: Timer  merge, Tian, Kevin
[Xen-ia64-devel] RE: Timer  merge,
Dong, Eddie <=
[Xen-ia64-devel] RE: Timer  merge, Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
[Xen-ia64-devel] RE: Timer  merge, Dong, Eddie
 |  |  | 
  
    |  |  |