WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] scheduler rate controller

To: George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Lv, Hui" <hui.lv@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] scheduler rate controller
From: Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 17:57:27 +0100
Cc: "Duan, Jiangang" <jiangang.duan@xxxxxxxxx>, "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Dong, Eddie" <eddie.dong@xxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 09:59:31 -0700
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:user-agent:date:subject:from:to:cc:message-id:thread-topic :thread-index:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=DOEB6O4cqwvF1yxHZ//nOsy5bw25BBmq9VH6QZVIOC4=; b=S48V1LaOTFjG9wJHOAA/8HMJcrpMSEhPSScOtiY+doKJU8g1srfLKj+p4ES2N0tsHP zXxKnNT569VuEt2Md6nkqWLKoHvmRfcgSEsXg1JfSC59Wv32r2g1DUVrt0KQcwLJ075b tvfj7J8WubZLlsf/I+8hqd4k7i5RUP5Q4/jDg=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <CAFLBxZZ9nqeb7CVqTZCsEtJRjgGMTHF2Ak929kvauj2KUFSOyg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcySbgJTwF9STDS7aEez2D8SH4kEvA==
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] scheduler rate controller
User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.30.0.110427
On 24/10/2011 17:17, "George Dunlap" <George.Dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> * I'm not sure I like the idea of doing this at the generic level than
> at the specific scheduler level -- e.g., inside of credit1.  For
> better or for worse, all aspects of scheduling work together, and even
> small changes tend to have a significant effect on the emergent
> behavior.  I understand why you'd want this in the generic scheduling
> code; but it seems like it would be better for each scheduler to
> implement a rate control independently.

Yes, this doesn't belong in schedule.c.

 -- Keir



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel