On Wed, 2011-10-05 at 11:18 +0100, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> > Either that or follow up to the original with the correct details for
> > the author.
> >
> > BTW, by adding your Signed-off-by you are certifying the contribution
> > per the Developer's Certificate of Origin
> > (http://lwn.net/Articles/437739/) which certifies that the contribution
> > can be submitted by you under the relevant open source license.
> >
> > This particular patch is probably too trivial to be an issue but in
> > general you would strictly speaking need a signed-off-by from the
> > original author, unless you happen to work for the same institution and
> > have right to contribute the works of others within that organisation.
>
> Sorry, I think I don't get this right, I'm the original author of this
> patch, the two links I've posted contain other different patches, that
> should not be added to Xen, because this patch fixes the issue using a
> different approach, so I think it's fine to include my signed-off-by.
Ah, that's OK then. I thought the original author was this "Charlie
Root" guy/pseudonym, but I suppose that's actually you and/or an
artefact of your local git repo/git send-email.
Ian.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|