WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] X86 MCE: Add SRAR handler

To: "Jinsong Liu" <jinsong.liu@xxxxxxxxx>, "Yunhong Jiang" <yunhong.jiang@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] X86 MCE: Add SRAR handler
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 11:05:51 +0100
Cc: "keir.xen@xxxxxxxxx" <keir.xen@xxxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 03:08:39 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <BC00F5384FCFC9499AF06F92E8B78A9E263B557F7C@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <BC00F5384FCFC9499AF06F92E8B78A9E263B557B77@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4E84ADF70200007800058882@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <789F9655DD1B8F43B48D77C5D306597312D2366A9B@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4E858AF30200007800058A64@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <BC00F5384FCFC9499AF06F92E8B78A9E263B557F02@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4E8592A60200007800058AD4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <BC00F5384FCFC9499AF06F92E8B78A9E263B557F40@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4E859D7F0200007800058B39@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <BC00F5384FCFC9499AF06F92E8B78A9E263B557F7C@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> On 30.09.11 at 11:42, "Liu, Jinsong" <jinsong.liu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>> On 30.09.11 at 10:21, "Liu, Jinsong" <jinsong.liu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Executing guest code will not satisfy the check
>>> if ( !(gstatus & MCG_STATUS_RIPV) && !guest_mode(regs))     return -1;
>>> so it would not panic system.
>> 
>> Exactly. But it should when the prefetch was to hypervisor code.
>> 
> 
> Wouldn't processor refresh instruction prefetch queue under such case?

That's a question that you are better positioned to answer than me.
But the SRAR errors being a sub-category of uncorrected errors I
would think it can't be that simple.

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel