Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] libxl: attempt to cleanup tapdisk proces

Ian Campbell writes ("[Xen-devel] [PATCH] libxl: attempt to cleanup tapdisk 
processes on disk backend destroy"):
> libxl: attempt to cleanup tapdisk processes on disk backend destroy.

This looks plausible to me, although I'm not hugely familiar with the
tapdisk machinery.

Committed-by: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[Xen-devel] [PATCH] libxl: attempt to cleanup tapdisk processes on disk backend destroy, Ian Campbell Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] libxl: attempt to cleanup tapdisk processes on disk backend destroy, Ian Jackson <=

Previous by Date:

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 00/10] [PATCH RFC V2] Paravirtualized ticketlocks, Linus Torvalds

Next by Date:

[Xen-devel] [PATCH] libxl: correctly propagate errors from libxl_domain_resume, Ian Campbell

Previous by Thread:

[Xen-devel] [PATCH] libxl: attempt to cleanup tapdisk processes on disk backend destroy, Ian Campbell

Next by Thread:

[Xen-devel] [PATCH] libxl: correct allocation size in libxl_list_nics, Ian Campbell

Indexes:

[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] libxl: attempt to cleanup tapdisk processes on d