So what was the verdict on this one? Is someone going to commit to
doing a "fake pdev" thing? If that's not going to happen before the
4.2 release, I suggest we take this patch in the mean time.
-George
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 3:20 PM, George Dunlap
<george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On some systems, requests devices behind a PCIe-to-PCI bridge all
> appear to the IOMMU as though they come from from slot 0, function
> 0 on that device; so the mapping code much punch a hole for X:0.0
> in the IOMMU for such devices. When punching the hole, if that device
> has already been mapped once, we simply need to check ownership to
> make sure it's legal. To do so, domain_context_mapping_one() will look
> up the device for the mapping with pci_get_pdev() and look for the owner.
>
> However, if there is no device in X:0.0, this look up will fail.
>
> Rather than returning -ENODEV in this situation (causing a failure in
> mapping the device), try to get the domain ownership from the iommu context
> mapping itself.
>
> Signed-off-by: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> diff -r 4a4882df5649 -r ede81b0552be xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/iommu.c
> --- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/iommu.c Wed Aug 31 15:23:49 2011 +0100
> +++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/iommu.c Thu Sep 01 15:18:18 2011 +0100
> @@ -113,6 +113,27 @@ static int context_set_domain_id(struct
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static int context_get_domain_id(struct context_entry *context,
> + struct iommu *iommu)
> +{
> + unsigned long dom_index, nr_dom;
> + int domid = -1;
> +
> + if (iommu && context)
> + {
> + nr_dom = cap_ndoms(iommu->cap);
> +
> + dom_index = context_domain_id(*context);
> +
> + if ( dom_index < nr_dom && iommu->domid_map)
> + domid = iommu->domid_map[dom_index];
> + else
> + dprintk(XENLOG_DEBUG VTDPREFIX, "%s: dom_index %lu exceeds
> nr_dom %lu or iommu has no domid_map\n",
> + __func__, dom_index, nr_dom);
> + }
> + return domid;
> +}
> +
> static struct intel_iommu *__init alloc_intel_iommu(void)
> {
> struct intel_iommu *intel;
> @@ -1237,7 +1258,6 @@ int domain_context_mapping_one(
> struct hvm_iommu *hd = domain_hvm_iommu(domain);
> struct context_entry *context, *context_entries;
> u64 maddr, pgd_maddr;
> - struct pci_dev *pdev = NULL;
> int agaw;
>
> ASSERT(spin_is_locked(&pcidevs_lock));
> @@ -1249,12 +1269,45 @@ int domain_context_mapping_one(
> if ( context_present(*context) )
> {
> int res = 0;
> + struct pci_dev *pdev = NULL;
>
> + /* First try to get domain ownership from device structure. If
> that's
> + * not available, try to read it from the context itself. */
> pdev = pci_get_pdev(bus, devfn);
> - if (!pdev)
> - res = -ENODEV;
> - else if (pdev->domain != domain)
> - res = -EINVAL;
> + if ( pdev )
> + {
> + if ( pdev->domain != domain )
> + {
> + dprintk(XENLOG_INFO VTDPREFIX, "d%d: bdf = %x:%x.%x owned by
> d%d!",
> + domain->domain_id,
> + bus, PCI_SLOT(devfn), PCI_FUNC(devfn),
> + (pdev->domain)
> + ? pdev->domain->domain_id : -1);
> + res = -EINVAL;
> + }
> + }
> + else
> + {
> + int cdomain;
> + cdomain = context_get_domain_id(context, iommu);
> +
> + if ( cdomain < 0 )
> + {
> + dprintk(VTDPREFIX, "d%d: bdf = %x:%x.%x mapped, but can't
> find owner!\n",
> + domain->domain_id,
> + bus, PCI_SLOT(devfn), PCI_FUNC(devfn));
> + res = -EINVAL;
> + }
> + else if ( cdomain != domain->domain_id )
> + {
> + dprintk(XENLOG_INFO VTDPREFIX, "d%d: bdf = %x:%x.%x already
> mapped to d%d!",
> + domain->domain_id,
> + bus, PCI_SLOT(devfn), PCI_FUNC(devfn),
> + cdomain);
> + res = -EINVAL;
> + }
> + }
> +
> unmap_vtd_domain_page(context_entries);
> spin_unlock(&iommu->lock);
> return res;
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Home