 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] 4.0/4.1 requests
| To: | Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>, Tim Deegan <tim@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Xen-devel] 4.0/4.1 requests |
| From: | Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 08 Sep 2011 12:29:30 +0100 |
| Cc: | "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Delivery-date: | Thu, 08 Sep 2011 04:30:15 -0700 |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:user-agent:date:subject:from:to:cc:message-id:thread-topic :thread-index:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=z24FIGD7GtWp5uOWT08Wpv6XPCxp74VKRKKlsr4jtdU=; b=c8qq+8+7yNihRvTPtF7xKMKUfvn258hOGrDgyobZcNRxyPtkqw/2gXd/tfiifEmXxy PPudTxQmADZBZF0kbDP7M7AlO6wbMNp4lDk5MpH/MBGv8So23sq+fLF8gvuoczm6PlG4 Q8QNXRONSkxxkfxoTrZCHbPmoRLGmslVmcQdQ= |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <4E68B13D020000780005544F@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Thread-index: | AcxuGpLrCCoDENtZ/0izM3gFz3AyZA== |
| Thread-topic: | [Xen-devel] 4.0/4.1 requests |
| User-agent: | Microsoft-Entourage/12.30.0.110427 |
On 08/09/2011 11:12, "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> On 08.09.11 at 11:19, "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Hi Keir,
>>
>> without the old IO-APIC part addressed, I wonder whether we should
>> really have the backport of 23805:7048810180de ("IRQ: manually EOI
>> migrating line interrupts") in both trees.
>>
>> I'd also like you to add 23820:ba75234a6f56 ("bitmap_scnlistprintf()
>> should always zero-terminate its output buffer") to 4.0 (I see it's
>> already in 4.1), as this not being fixed confuses 'e' debug key output.
>
> Also shouldn't we have a backport of 23112:84e3706df07a ("Passthrough:
> disable bus-mastering on any card that causes an IOMMU fault.") in the
> 4.0 tree (even if it doesn't fully address the problem, yet - that's the
> case in the other trees too)?
Now done.
-- Keir
> Jan
>
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Xen-devel] Re: 4.0/4.1 requests, Keir Fraser |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Xen-devel] Re: 4.0/4.1 requests, Jan Beulich |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] 4.0/4.1 requests, Jan Beulich |
| Next by Thread: | [Xen-devel] Re: 4.0/4.1 requests, Keir Fraser |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
