WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] IRQ: Group IRQ_MOVE_CLEANUP_VECTOR with other hy

To: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] IRQ: Group IRQ_MOVE_CLEANUP_VECTOR with other hypervisor IPIs
From: Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2011 10:14:02 +0100
Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "xiantao.zhang@xxxxxxxxx" <xiantao.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Thu, 08 Sep 2011 02:14:49 -0700
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:user-agent:date:subject:from:to:cc:message-id:thread-topic :thread-index:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=zUWDtt+ZioOloXTH8kUS+XQevYXASFPih/3wBxYMIwY=; b=ufgT+3wOQKMoFIVjqfLI5ZxYhuYzz9/Yybg/zPG9SmRb8a5yJw3VOKJ6UDXagvCgsU hpzfuhwy4iMThkSirm4c+Vhi2pe3DUF8d1O6+gi4Fhkb6N3NB4wvNebTWDjgCmL1NpLr axt1rsMzX6aO8W2o6DMeJQ8lZmShowl1oeAu0=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4E6886A3.3060402@xxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcxuB6ZAJHfenP5aDUy5ale3TMwq+Q==
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] IRQ: Group IRQ_MOVE_CLEANUP_VECTOR with other hypervisor IPIs
User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.30.0.110427
On 08/09/2011 10:10, "Andrew Cooper" <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>> Andrew: I think we have to leave this vector where it is, but you could add
>> a comment explaining why it is so, in your cleanup patchset.
>> 
>>  -- Keir 
> 
> Wow I was having a slow day - I was thinking that
> IRQ_MOVE_CLEANUP_VECTOR was the first high priority vector.
> 
> In which case it should probably stay at its current vector, but
> FIRST_DYNAMIC_VECTOR should probably be bumped up, as it is no longer a
> vector dynamically allocated to guests.

Sounds reasonable.

 -- Keir



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel