WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] RE: ext4 BUG in dom0 Kernel 2.6.32.36

To: MaoXiaoyun <tinnycloud@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] RE: ext4 BUG in dom0 Kernel 2.6.32.36
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 11:55:02 -0700
Cc: linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xen devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 11:55:41 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <BLU157-W4106FA4CF4EBA78C63FDA0DA1C0@xxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <BLU157-W499E698F650F554E645F9DDA1C0@xxxxxxx>, <20110906145347.GA4133@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <BLU157-W4106FA4CF4EBA78C63FDA0DA1C0@xxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110816 Thunderbird/6.0
On 09/06/2011 08:11 AM, MaoXiaoyun wrote:
>
> > Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 10:53:47 -0400
> > From: konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx
> > To: tinnycloud@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > CC: linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> jeremy@xxxxxxxx
> > Subject: Re: ext4 BUG in dom0 Kernel 2.6.32.36
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 03:24:14PM +0800, MaoXiaoyun wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi:
> > >
> > > I've met an ext4 Bug in dom0 kernel 2.6.32.36. (See kernel stack
> below)
> >
> > Did you try the 3.0 kernel?
> No, I am afried the change would be to much for our current env.
> May result in other stable issue.
> So, I want to dig out what really happen. Hopes.

Another question is whether this is a regression compared to earlier
versions of 2.6.32? Do you know if this problem exists in a non-Xen
environment?

Thanks,
J

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel