On Tue, 2011-09-06 at 17:06 +0100, Tim Deegan wrote:
> At 16:54 +0100 on 06 Sep (1315328056), Andrew Cooper wrote:
> > On 06/09/11 16:47, George Dunlap wrote:
> > > Wei,
> > >
> > > Quick question: Am I reading the code correctly, that even with
> > > per-device interrupt remap tables, that GSIs are accounted to the
> > > intremap table of the corresponding IOAPIC, presumably because the
> > > IOMMU sees interrupts generated as GSIs as coming from the IOAPIC? In
> > > that case, then we need all devices sharing the same IOAPIC must not
> > > have any vector collisions. Is that correct?
> >
> > Based on the ICH10 IO-APIC documentation with respect to auto EOIs, we
> > cant have any two IRQs across any IO-APICs sharing a vector,
> > irrespective of IOMMU or not. (Because the EOI'ing an IO-APIC entry
> > only takes account of vector and not destination)
>
> If this is the case, is there any point in having per-CPU IDTs?
> Or per-device remapping tables?
Yes, for devices that use MSIs, at least.
-George
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Home