WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] [PATCH 02/13] x86/ticketlock: collapse a layer of functions

To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 02/13] x86/ticketlock: collapse a layer of functions
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2011 17:54:55 -0700
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@xxxxxxxxxx>, Nick Piggin <npiggin@xxxxxxxxx>, KVM <kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@xxxxxxxxxx>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Avi Kivity <avi@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@xxxxxxxxxx>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Xen Devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Thu, 01 Sep 2011 17:56:15 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <cover.1314922370.git.jeremy.fitzhardinge@xxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <cover.1314922370.git.jeremy.fitzhardinge@xxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <cover.1314922370.git.jeremy.fitzhardinge@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <cover.1314922370.git.jeremy.fitzhardinge@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@xxxxxxxxxx>

Now that the paravirtualization layer doesn't exist at the spinlock
level any more, we can collapse the __ticket_ functions into the arch_
functions.

Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/spinlock.h |   35 +++++------------------------------
 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/spinlock.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/spinlock.h
index f5d9236..c1d9617 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/spinlock.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/spinlock.h
@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ static __always_inline void __ticket_unlock_kick(struct 
arch_spinlock *lock, __t
  * save some instructions and make the code more elegant. There really isn't
  * much between them in performance though, especially as locks are out of 
line.
  */
-static __always_inline void __ticket_spin_lock(struct arch_spinlock *lock)
+static __always_inline void arch_spin_lock(struct arch_spinlock *lock)
 {
        register struct __raw_tickets inc = { .tail = 1 };
 
@@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ static __always_inline void __ticket_spin_lock(struct 
arch_spinlock *lock)
 out:   barrier();              /* make sure nothing creeps before the lock is 
taken */
 }
 
-static __always_inline int __ticket_spin_trylock(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
+static __always_inline int arch_spin_trylock(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
 {
        arch_spinlock_t old, new;
 
@@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ static __always_inline void 
__ticket_unlock_release(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
 }
 #endif
 
-static __always_inline void __ticket_spin_unlock(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
+static __always_inline void arch_spin_unlock(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
 {
        __ticket_t next = lock->tickets.head + 1;
 
@@ -141,46 +141,21 @@ static __always_inline void 
__ticket_spin_unlock(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
        __ticket_unlock_kick(lock, next);
 }
 
-static inline int __ticket_spin_is_locked(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
+static inline int arch_spin_is_locked(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
 {
        struct __raw_tickets tmp = ACCESS_ONCE(lock->tickets);
 
        return !!(tmp.tail ^ tmp.head);
 }
 
-static inline int __ticket_spin_is_contended(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
+static inline int arch_spin_is_contended(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
 {
        struct __raw_tickets tmp = ACCESS_ONCE(lock->tickets);
 
        return ((tmp.tail - tmp.head) & TICKET_MASK) > 1;
 }
-
-static inline int arch_spin_is_locked(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
-{
-       return __ticket_spin_is_locked(lock);
-}
-
-static inline int arch_spin_is_contended(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
-{
-       return __ticket_spin_is_contended(lock);
-}
 #define arch_spin_is_contended arch_spin_is_contended
 
-static __always_inline void arch_spin_lock(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
-{
-       __ticket_spin_lock(lock);
-}
-
-static __always_inline int arch_spin_trylock(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
-{
-       return __ticket_spin_trylock(lock);
-}
-
-static __always_inline void arch_spin_unlock(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
-{
-       __ticket_spin_unlock(lock);
-}
-
 static __always_inline void arch_spin_lock_flags(arch_spinlock_t *lock,
                                                  unsigned long flags)
 {
-- 
1.7.6


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel