WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH V2 1/3] xen-blkfront: add BLKIF_OP_TRIM and backe

To: Li Dongyang <lidongyang@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH V2 1/3] xen-blkfront: add BLKIF_OP_TRIM and backend type flags
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 17:38:54 -0700
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, owen.smith@xxxxxxxxxx, JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 17:40:16 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1313660071-25230-2-git-send-email-lidongyang@xxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <1313660071-25230-1-git-send-email-lidongyang@xxxxxxxxxx> <1313660071-25230-2-git-send-email-lidongyang@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110707 Thunderbird/5.0
On 08/18/2011 02:34 AM, Li Dongyang wrote:
> This adds the BLKIF_OP_TRIM for blkfront and blkback, also 2 flags telling
> us the type of the backend, used in blkback to determine what to do when we
> see a trim request.
> Part of the patch is just taken from Owen Smith, Thanks
>
> Signed-off-by: Owen Smith <owen.smith@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Li Dongyang <lidongyang@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  include/xen/interface/io/blkif.h |   21 +++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/xen/interface/io/blkif.h 
> b/include/xen/interface/io/blkif.h
> index 3d5d6db..b92cf23 100644
> --- a/include/xen/interface/io/blkif.h
> +++ b/include/xen/interface/io/blkif.h
> @@ -57,6 +57,19 @@ typedef uint64_t blkif_sector_t;
>   * "feature-flush-cache" node!
>   */
>  #define BLKIF_OP_FLUSH_DISKCACHE   3
> +
> +/*
> + * Recognised only if "feature-trim" is present in backend xenbus info.
> + * The "feature-trim" node contains a boolean indicating whether barrier
> + * requests are likely to succeed or fail. Either way, a trim request

Barrier requests?

> + * may fail at any time with BLKIF_RSP_EOPNOTSUPP if it is unsupported by
> + * the underlying block-device hardware. The boolean simply indicates whether
> + * or not it is worthwhile for the frontend to attempt trim requests.
> + * If a backend does not recognise BLKIF_OP_TRIM, it should *not*
> + * create the "feature-trim" node!

Is all this necessary?  What happens if guests just send OP_TRIM
requests, and if the host doesn't understand them then it will fails
them with EOPNOTSUPP?  Is a TRIM request ever anything more than a hint
to the backend that certain blocks are no longer needed?

> + */
> +#define BLKIF_OP_TRIM            5
> +
>  /*
>   * Maximum scatter/gather segments per request.
>   * This is carefully chosen so that sizeof(struct blkif_ring) <= PAGE_SIZE.
> @@ -74,6 +87,11 @@ struct blkif_request_rw {
>       } seg[BLKIF_MAX_SEGMENTS_PER_REQUEST];
>  };
>  
> +struct blkif_request_trim {
> +     blkif_sector_t sector_number;
> +     uint64_t nr_sectors;
> +};
> +
>  struct blkif_request {
>       uint8_t        operation;    /* BLKIF_OP_???                         */
>       uint8_t        nr_segments;  /* number of segments                   */
> @@ -81,6 +99,7 @@ struct blkif_request {
>       uint64_t       id;           /* private guest value, echoed in resp  */
>       union {
>               struct blkif_request_rw rw;
> +             struct blkif_request_trim trim;
>       } u;
>  };
>  
> @@ -109,6 +128,8 @@ DEFINE_RING_TYPES(blkif, struct blkif_request, struct 
> blkif_response);
>  #define VDISK_CDROM        0x1
>  #define VDISK_REMOVABLE    0x2
>  #define VDISK_READONLY     0x4
> +#define VDISK_FILE_BACKEND 0x8
> +#define VDISK_PHY_BACKEND  0x10

What are these for?  Why does a frontend care about these?

    J

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel