WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] [PATCH] tools/ioemu: Fixing Security Hole in Qemu MSIX table

To: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>, George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Tim Deegan <Tim.Deegan@xxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] tools/ioemu: Fixing Security Hole in Qemu MSIX table access management
From: Haitao Shan <maillists.shan@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 13:24:59 +0800
Cc:
Delivery-date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 22:25:51 -0700
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=dE2/wf7tJDPfgfEKawOqdccqg0A9jXUnGJ6GgatxDgg=; b=nrw9MJrzlmJP8HR/9uCRKaysitcmOuIVz/SwfwmLKD7+AtFOsa44Y34CgsDwYnrlWJ 4Evmw6QfPRrs4X8xn8zeKdpDjK0se23+RbE7Lnw6bqsRCz3yOeFIc5cZXY6wmWKPzXWZ WIkYTun9Q+rvv4QN5N/uVBEKcD4gt34Ur+im0=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi,

As reported by Jan, current Qemu does not handle MSIX table mapping properly.

Details:

MSI-X table resides in one of the physical BARs. When Qemu handles
guest's changes to BAR register (within which, MSI-X table resides),
Qemu first allows access of the whole BAR MMIO ranges and then removes
those of MSI-X. There is a small window here. It is possible that on a
SMP guests one vcpu could have access to the physical MSI-X
configurations when another vcpu is writing BAR registers.

The patch fixes this issue by first producing the valid MMIO ranges by
removing MSI-X table's range from the whole BAR mmio range and later
passing these ranges to Xen.

Please have a review, thanks!

Signed-off-by:    Shan Haitao <haitao.shan@xxxxxxxxx>

diff --git a/hw/pass-through.c b/hw/pass-through.c
index 9c5620d..b9c2f32 100644
--- a/hw/pass-through.c
+++ b/hw/pass-through.c
@@ -92,6 +92,7 @@

 #include <unistd.h>
 #include <sys/ioctl.h>
+#include <assert.h>

 extern int gfx_passthru;
 int igd_passthru = 0;
@@ -1103,6 +1104,7 @@ static void pt_iomem_map(PCIDevice *d, int i,
uint32_t e_phys, uint32_t e_size,
 {
     struct pt_dev *assigned_device  = (struct pt_dev *)d;
     uint32_t old_ebase = assigned_device->bases[i].e_physbase;
+    uint32_t msix_last_pfn = 0, bar_last_pfn = 0;
     int first_map = ( assigned_device->bases[i].e_size == 0 );
     int ret = 0;

@@ -1118,39 +1120,124 @@ static void pt_iomem_map(PCIDevice *d, int i,
uint32_t e_phys, uint32_t e_size,

     if ( !first_map && old_ebase != -1 )
     {
-        add_msix_mapping(assigned_device, i);
-        /* Remove old mapping */
-        ret = xc_domain_memory_mapping(xc_handle, domid,
+        if ( has_msix_mapping(assigned_device, i) )
+        {
+            msix_last_pfn = (assigned_device->msix->mmio_base_addr - 1 +
+                  assigned_device->msix->total_entries * 16) >>  XC_PAGE_SHIFT;
+            bar_last_pfn = (old_ebase + e_size - 1) >> XC_PAGE_SHIFT;
+
+            if ( assigned_device->msix->table_off )
+            {
+                       ret = xc_domain_memory_mapping(xc_handle, domid,
+                    old_ebase >> XC_PAGE_SHIFT,
+                    assigned_device->bases[i].access.maddr >> XC_PAGE_SHIFT,
+                    (assigned_device->msix->mmio_base_addr >> XC_PAGE_SHIFT)
+                    - (old_ebase >> XC_PAGE_SHIFT),
+                    DPCI_REMOVE_MAPPING);
+                if ( ret != 0 )
+                {
+                    PT_LOG("Error: remove old mapping failed!\n");
+                    return;
+                }
+            }
+            if ( msix_last_pfn != bar_last_pfn )
+            {
+                assert(msix_last_pfn < bar_last_pfn);
+                       ret = xc_domain_memory_mapping(xc_handle, domid,
+                    msix_last_pfn + 1,
+                    (assigned_device->bases[i].access.maddr +
+                     assigned_device->msix->table_off +
+                     assigned_device->msix->total_entries * 16 +
+                     XC_PAGE_SIZE -1) >>  XC_PAGE_SHIFT,
+                    bar_last_pfn - msix_last_pfn,
+                    DPCI_REMOVE_MAPPING);
+                if ( ret != 0 )
+                {
+                    PT_LOG("Error: remove old mapping failed!\n");
+                    return;
+                }
+            }
+        }
+        else
+        {
+                   /* Remove old mapping */
+                   ret = xc_domain_memory_mapping(xc_handle, domid,
                 old_ebase >> XC_PAGE_SHIFT,
                 assigned_device->bases[i].access.maddr >> XC_PAGE_SHIFT,
                 (e_size+XC_PAGE_SIZE-1) >> XC_PAGE_SHIFT,
                 DPCI_REMOVE_MAPPING);
-        if ( ret != 0 )
-        {
-            PT_LOG("Error: remove old mapping failed!\n");
-            return;
+            if ( ret != 0 )
+            {
+                PT_LOG("Error: remove old mapping failed!\n");
+                return;
+            }
         }
     }

     /* map only valid guest address */
     if (e_phys != -1)
     {
-        /* Create new mapping */
-        ret = xc_domain_memory_mapping(xc_handle, domid,
+        if ( has_msix_mapping(assigned_device, i) )
+               {
+            assigned_device->msix->mmio_base_addr =
+                assigned_device->bases[i].e_physbase
+                + assigned_device->msix->table_off;
+
+            msix_last_pfn = (assigned_device->msix->mmio_base_addr - 1 +
+                  assigned_device->msix->total_entries * 16) >>  XC_PAGE_SHIFT;
+            bar_last_pfn = (e_phys + e_size - 1) >> XC_PAGE_SHIFT;
+
+            cpu_register_physical_memory(assigned_device->msix->mmio_base_addr,
+                                 assigned_device->msix->total_entries * 16,
+                                 assigned_device->msix->mmio_index);
+
+            if ( assigned_device->msix->table_off )
+            {
+                       ret = xc_domain_memory_mapping(xc_handle, domid,
+                    assigned_device->bases[i].e_physbase >> XC_PAGE_SHIFT,
+                    assigned_device->bases[i].access.maddr >> XC_PAGE_SHIFT,
+                    (assigned_device->msix->mmio_base_addr >> XC_PAGE_SHIFT)
+                    - (assigned_device->bases[i].e_physbase >> XC_PAGE_SHIFT),
+                    DPCI_ADD_MAPPING);
+                if ( ret != 0 )
+                {
+                    PT_LOG("Error: remove old mapping failed!\n");
+                    return;
+                }
+            }
+            if ( msix_last_pfn != bar_last_pfn )
+            {
+                assert(msix_last_pfn < bar_last_pfn);
+                       ret = xc_domain_memory_mapping(xc_handle, domid,
+                    msix_last_pfn + 1,
+                    (assigned_device->bases[i].access.maddr +
+                     assigned_device->msix->table_off +
+                     assigned_device->msix->total_entries * 16 +
+                     XC_PAGE_SIZE -1) >>  XC_PAGE_SHIFT,
+                    bar_last_pfn - msix_last_pfn,
+                    DPCI_ADD_MAPPING);
+                if ( ret != 0 )
+                {
+                    PT_LOG("Error: remove old mapping failed!\n");
+                    return;
+                }
+            }
+               }
+               else
+        {
+                       /* Create new mapping */
+                       ret = xc_domain_memory_mapping(xc_handle, domid,
                 assigned_device->bases[i].e_physbase >> XC_PAGE_SHIFT,
                 assigned_device->bases[i].access.maddr >> XC_PAGE_SHIFT,
                 (e_size+XC_PAGE_SIZE-1) >> XC_PAGE_SHIFT,
                 DPCI_ADD_MAPPING);

-        if ( ret != 0 )
-        {
-            PT_LOG("Error: create new mapping failed!\n");
+            if ( ret != 0 )
+            {
+                PT_LOG("Error: create new mapping failed!\n");
+            }
         }

-        ret = remove_msix_mapping(assigned_device, i);
-        if ( ret != 0 )
-            PT_LOG("Error: remove MSI-X mmio mapping failed!\n");
-
         if ( old_ebase != e_phys && old_ebase != -1 )
             pt_msix_update_remap(assigned_device, i);
     }
diff --git a/hw/pt-msi.c b/hw/pt-msi.c
index 71fa6f0..1fbebd4 100644
--- a/hw/pt-msi.c
+++ b/hw/pt-msi.c
@@ -528,39 +528,12 @@ static CPUReadMemoryFunc *pci_msix_read[] = {
     pci_msix_readl
 };

-int add_msix_mapping(struct pt_dev *dev, int bar_index)
+int has_msix_mapping(struct pt_dev *dev, int bar_index)
 {
     if ( !(dev->msix && dev->msix->bar_index == bar_index) )
         return 0;

-    return xc_domain_memory_mapping(xc_handle, domid,
-                dev->msix->mmio_base_addr >> XC_PAGE_SHIFT,
-                (dev->bases[bar_index].access.maddr
-                + dev->msix->table_off) >> XC_PAGE_SHIFT,
-                (dev->msix->total_entries * 16
-                + XC_PAGE_SIZE -1) >> XC_PAGE_SHIFT,
-                DPCI_ADD_MAPPING);
-}
-
-int remove_msix_mapping(struct pt_dev *dev, int bar_index)
-{
-    if ( !(dev->msix && dev->msix->bar_index == bar_index) )
-        return 0;
-
-    dev->msix->mmio_base_addr = dev->bases[bar_index].e_physbase
-                                + dev->msix->table_off;
-
-    cpu_register_physical_memory(dev->msix->mmio_base_addr,
-                                 dev->msix->total_entries * 16,
-                                 dev->msix->mmio_index);
-
-    return xc_domain_memory_mapping(xc_handle, domid,
-                dev->msix->mmio_base_addr >> XC_PAGE_SHIFT,
-                (dev->bases[bar_index].access.maddr
-                + dev->msix->table_off) >> XC_PAGE_SHIFT,
-                (dev->msix->total_entries * 16
-                + XC_PAGE_SIZE -1) >> XC_PAGE_SHIFT,
-                DPCI_REMOVE_MAPPING);
+       return 1;
 }

 int pt_msix_init(struct pt_dev *dev, int pos)
diff --git a/hw/pt-msi.h b/hw/pt-msi.h
index 9664f89..2dc1720 100644
--- a/hw/pt-msi.h
+++ b/hw/pt-msi.h
@@ -107,10 +107,7 @@ void
 pt_msix_disable(struct pt_dev *dev);

 int
-remove_msix_mapping(struct pt_dev *dev, int bar_index);
-
-int
-add_msix_mapping(struct pt_dev *dev, int bar_index);
+has_msix_mapping(struct pt_dev *dev, int bar_index);

 int
 pt_msix_init(struct pt_dev *dev, int pos);

Attachment: fix_msix_sec_hole.patch
Description: Binary data

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel