 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-devel
AW: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: [Xen-devel] No C-States any longer...
| To: | "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>, mark.langsdorf@xxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | AW: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: [Xen-devel] No C-States any longer... |
| From: | Carsten Schiers <carsten@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 16 Jun 2011 08:22:22 +0200 |
| Cc: | xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Yu, Ke" <ke.yu@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Delivery-date: | Wed, 15 Jun 2011 23:22:54 -0700 |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=mail.zeus06.de; h=date: from:to:cc:message-id:subject:mime-version:content-type; q= dns/txt; s=beta; bh=9T/G6cwD2uxqx1BXNiUoNhY4dw5WWFZu37xehIN7jzE=; b= LdDjVEn5J+vt43+zMp1fW8tu8zQWdwwEB/HZebxDzRtZLM1F0sMCt3NXRk+9Be8/ kenNB03Aavp/tRyF1PNceDwUvgwWik8qsr9iArv0bzTVIvi3qs2j3t2yy8rtz+wy PKk51QaXhGDqqA8umWCfs4hyy6O+0HAJauRmxsuFQNE= |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
>In your case there's no _CST found, and then no PBLK found. The only thing that are giveing me hope are: - it worked once (Xenified 2.6.18.8) - FADT contains C2/C3 Latency information (_CST Support is 00 BTW) >do you mean the latest PVOPS from Konzad? I don't think Cstate/Pstate patches >have been carried there, which still stay in Jeremy's tree. Currently I tried with stable 2.6.32.x from Jeremy and Debian Squeeze, as Konrad said, his 2.6.39.x would expose C-States for him, what did not before, I will try his 2.6.39.x next. I can check this and native boot results tonight. >Since this is the AMD box which I'm not familiar with, also CC Mark here who is >the owner for power management on AMD boxes. Mark, I realy hope you have an idea. This is - by the way - the X3 400e I just bought because I never succeeded in getting TSC hickup-free >2.6.18 systems with my 4050e, you eventually remember...? Carsten. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH] acpi/xen: Evaluate the _PDC properly (for 2.6.32, and 2.6.39), Tian, Kevin |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: [Xen-devel] No C-States any longer..., Tian, Kevin |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: [Xen-devel] No C-States any longer..., Tian, Kevin |
| Next by Thread: | RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: [Xen-devel] No C-States any longer..., Tian, Kevin |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
