Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] libxc: use correct macro when unmapping memory after save operation

[Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Jim Fehlig writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] libxc: use correct macro when 
unmapping memory after save operation"):
> BTW, thanks for the commit message note about "backporting to relevant
> earlier trees".  I was going to ask that this be applied to
> 4.1-testing.  Should such a statement be included for fixes that apply
> to multiple trees?  Is it helpful for scanning potential backports in
> -unstable?

Yes, exactly.  I think it would be a good idea to put such a statement
(including at least the literal string "backport" in such changes).

That's why I put it in in that case.  We're about to do RCs point
releases for 4.0 and 4.1 but after that we should consider these
changes.

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel