xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.0-testing test] 7147: regressions - FAIL
On Sat, May 21, Keir Fraser wrote:
> Related to the -Wno-unused-but-set-variable patch. But this is weird because
> the compiler runs many times with this option quite happily, before failing
> on it as an unrecognised option much later in the build (building qemu in
> this case, or stubdom in the case of xen-unstable). Any ideas?
This is weird, why did the new option get passed to CFLAGS anyway?
Its properly filtered out in my SLES11SP1 builds.
What compiler is that?
Olaf
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.0-testing test] 7147: regressions - FAIL, (continued)
- Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.0-testing test] 7147: regressions - FAIL, Ian Jackson
- Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.0-testing test] 7147: regressions - FAIL, Ian Jackson
- Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.0-testing test] 7147: regressions - FAIL, Ian Campbell
- Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.0-testing test] 7147: regressions - FAIL, Ian Jackson
- Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.0-testing test] 7147: regressions - FAIL, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.0-testing test] 7147: regressions - FAIL, Ian Jackson
- Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.0-testing test] 7147: regressions - FAIL, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.0-testing test] 7147: regressions - FAIL, Ian Jackson
- Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.0-testing test] 7147: regressions - FAIL, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.0-testing test] 7147: regressions - FAIL, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.0-testing test] 7147: regressions - FAIL,
Olaf Hering <=
- Re:[Xen-devel] [xen-4.0-testing test] 7147: regressions - FAIL, M A Young
|
|
|