WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [RFC PATCH] set current_state to D0 in register_slot

To: Ian Campbell <ijc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [RFC PATCH] set current_state to D0 in register_slot
From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 08:43:54 -0700
Cc: "linux-pci@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-pci@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Allen Kay <allen.m.kay@xxxxxxxxx>, "linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Wed, 11 May 2011 08:45:56 -0700
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=virtuousgeek.org; h=Received:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:X-Mailer:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Identified-User; b=bsf5E42v+FhKBk/pyJxMWpxECYDl03Sbra0huR/ArJ4Xzy51ustDoH55Nn7c878dKo5YPwEB7BxRDBydvw2a74Q7/eFa4EZ0l/ZBcghXoFDyIvCKMecd0E8+41Y62NdB;
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1305120818.26692.394.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1102281605130.2917@kaball-desktop> <20110304104251.45b257c4@jbarnes-desktop> <1299595858.17339.512.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1299601032.17339.525.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1103161230570.3382@kaball-desktop> <20110316083205.405910ac@jbarnes-desktop> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1103161610110.3382@kaball-desktop> <1305120818.26692.394.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Wed, 11 May 2011 14:33:38 +0100
Ian Campbell <ijc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi Jesse,
> 
> On Wed, 2011-03-16 at 16:13 +0000, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > On Wed, 16 Mar 2011, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > > On Wed, 16 Mar 2011 12:34:10 +0000
> > > Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Jesse,
> > > > do you have any comments on the following patch?
> > > > Also, are you OK with taking "set current_state to D0 in register_slot"
> > > > in your tree? Otherwise should I send a pull request to Linus with the
> > > > patch and your ack?
> > > 
> > > Yeah, I think the patch is ok, I can send it to Linus either as part of
> > > my 2.6.39 pull req (though it's probably too late for that) or in my
> > > next -fixes pull.
> > 
> > Great, thanks!
> > 
> > Just to be clear there are two different patches, the first one is "set
> > current_state to D0 in register_slot":
> > 
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/2/28/296
> > 
> > the second one by Ian Campbell is "acpiphp: assume device is in state D0
> > after powering on a slot.":
> > 
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/3/8/212
> 
> Looks like the first of these is in your tree but not the second. Do you
> want me to resend and/or rework it?

Yeah, please re-send it, I confused the two and thought Stefano's was
sufficient.

-- 
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel