On Wed, 11 May 2011 14:33:38 +0100
Ian Campbell <ijc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Jesse,
> On Wed, 2011-03-16 at 16:13 +0000, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > On Wed, 16 Mar 2011, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > > On Wed, 16 Mar 2011 12:34:10 +0000
> > > Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Jesse,
> > > > do you have any comments on the following patch?
> > > > Also, are you OK with taking "set current_state to D0 in register_slot"
> > > > in your tree? Otherwise should I send a pull request to Linus with the
> > > > patch and your ack?
> > >
> > > Yeah, I think the patch is ok, I can send it to Linus either as part of
> > > my 2.6.39 pull req (though it's probably too late for that) or in my
> > > next -fixes pull.
> > Great, thanks!
> > Just to be clear there are two different patches, the first one is "set
> > current_state to D0 in register_slot":
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/2/28/296
> > the second one by Ian Campbell is "acpiphp: assume device is in state D0
> > after powering on a slot.":
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/3/8/212
> Looks like the first of these is in your tree but not the second. Do you
> want me to resend and/or rework it?
Yeah, please re-send it, I confused the two and thought Stefano's was
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center
Xen-devel mailing list