Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 6 of 8] FPU: create lazy and non-lazy FPU

>>> On 07.05.11 at 07:42, "Huang2, Wei" <Wei.Huang2@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>--- a/xen/arch/x86/i387.c      Fri May 06 10:40:22 2011 -0500
>+++ b/xen/arch/x86/i387.c      Fri May 06 10:53:35 2011 -0500
>@@ -98,13 +98,13 @@
> /*      FPU Save Functions     */
> /*******************************/
> /* Save x87 extended state */
>-static inline void fpu_xsave(struct vcpu *v, uint64_t mask)
>+static inline void fpu_xsave(struct vcpu *v)

This looks okay now to me, only a cosmetic comment: You add the
"mask" parameter in patch 5, just to remove it here again.

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[Xen-devel] [PATCH 6 of 8] FPU: create lazy and non-lazy FPU restore functions, Huang2, Wei Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 6 of 8] FPU: create lazy and non-lazy FPU restore functions, Jan Beulich <=

Previous by Date:

Re: [Xen-devel] Re: non-contiguous allocations, Keir Fraser

Next by Date:

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0 of 8] FPU LWP: patch description, Jan Beulich

Previous by Thread:

[Xen-devel] [PATCH 6 of 8] FPU: create lazy and non-lazy FPU restore functions, Huang2, Wei

Next by Thread:

[Xen-devel] [PATCH 8 of 8] LWP: Add LWP support for SVM guests, Huang2, Wei

Indexes:

[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]