WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 6947: regressions - trouble: broken/

To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 6947: regressions - trouble: broken/fail/pass
From: Keir Fraser <keir.xen@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 02 May 2011 14:39:19 +0100
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Mon, 02 May 2011 06:40:24 -0700
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:user-agent:date:subject:from:to:cc:message-id :thread-topic:thread-index:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=xRKnwzps73YJzJe3bXexls28cKQLGHvxvssF1U3GbOg=; b=AeAN7lZ6M/7AN8ejDKGzOocG++LH5oS7/FfF34NGw7VW00olHN04Pj79wVVVEiAjdl MmaysbH6tZixslwrIWFBOT3C+R7BkoJKdkpUKwCSfXf3HhAhXmV9u5EjKR5uvcEsFa/V ywle1YRkvy/y35ucHyb6UDUiwcY0NqNQ0fG74=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=user-agent:date:subject:from:to:cc:message-id:thread-topic :thread-index:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=ZBBnu+XY3e+cPbxp9TwItkq4T1shwNNvL71XsHMTYgU8HGQ7cYNzlbuUZP2FIBlYKo /U8okfZQnHq6ziM5Lxlj0KTCTpPe1ayJxvvTWhxIl94l4q3rgrBgfb+FX7p52Ld4KOn8 fmKBZYonL0adwmCHyjDMmKkgLINTsDN2i8XaY=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <C9E46CB7.17164%keir.xen@xxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcwIytXIPAut4LfhEE+Yoia5nR2F7wAA4B0d
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 6947: regressions - trouble: broken/fail/pass
User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.29.0.110113
On 02/05/2011 14:14, "Keir Fraser" <keir.xen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> We'd probably also need an extra lock to protect against concurrent
> radix-tree update operations (should be pretty straightforward to add
> however, needing to protect *only* the radix-tree update calls).

Actually this second lock would need to encompass both the logical and
physical insert/delete operations. Possibly there is already a non-IRQ lock
on these code paths that can contain irq_desc-locked regions. If not then
such a lock would need to be added.

 -- Keir



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>