 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] force option of xm block-detach
| To: | James Harper <james.harper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Xen-devel] force option of xm block-detach |
| From: | Keir Fraser <keir.xen@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 21 Mar 2011 08:27:25 +0000 |
| Cc: | |
| Delivery-date: | Mon, 21 Mar 2011 01:28:01 -0700 |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:user-agent:date:subject:from:to:message-id :thread-topic:thread-index:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=m0S06roIQfhLJLIIGmLtwXkiPJlBhNBw1e1MWLth5y8=; b=WWPw7MJbkkat554lDm3nt4faLCB2ZkLXgdY4nfn3mS0bUAcqLoqYiTIizCAZrUCatO lKwEIGOhRRPywlp+oWmqj9Udvu4c9Uww6fJ/cVjeg3st5WHuiSkT0E5M12AXF3KmKBWU YuBWAEqVKfiIcr4KjwNPyRwnniOlA5De1oINM= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=user-agent:date:subject:from:to:message-id:thread-topic :thread-index:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=oIa3yEdYWgwUI4+/GzGrZJSBlD9OCRR+omBUGdip4prI23ktX0m/4yNCUa4usQepMw tXUGzpgXKZG5igmF/doFjh8LaIUOTBxWxTu7672Waj8Sfm+sAj9FJCWIPOsQDaeVi0rw a079THu3y7lrhTM5KxPpevVVy+Mm02N9ygZzQ= |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <AEC6C66638C05B468B556EA548C1A77D01CC816F@trantor> |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Thread-index: | AcvniSWzdRTYNjDCQkqMkUFueg924wAGKjHP |
| Thread-topic: | [Xen-devel] force option of xm block-detach |
| User-agent: | Microsoft-Entourage/12.28.0.101117 |
On 21/03/2011 05:30, "James Harper" <james.harper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > How does the 'force' option to block-detach differ to not using it? Can > DomU PV drivers tell if this is a forceful detach request? I believe it means after a timeout we will simply delete the xenstore info relating to the VBD, rather than wait an arbitrary time for the xenbus connection to get driven into disconnected state. Thus it's not something that is made visible to frontend/backend drivers. -- Keir > Thanks > > James > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/mce: CPU notifiers must not be registered a second time during resume, Jan Beulich |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Xen-devel] DSN: failed (Returned mail: Data format error), Mailbot for etexusa . com |
| Previous by Thread: | [Xen-devel] force option of xm block-detach, James Harper |
| Next by Thread: | [Xen-devel] Re: force option of xm block-detach, Paolo Bonzini |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
