WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] libxl: implement trigger s3resume

To: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] libxl: implement trigger s3resume
From: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 15:29:59 +0000
Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 07:30:57 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <19756.35979.333697.849223@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1101101059170.2390@kaball-desktop> <19756.35979.333697.849223@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23)
On Tue, 11 Jan 2011, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Stefano Stabellini writes ("[Xen-devel] [PATCH] libxl: implement trigger 
> s3resume"):
> > Implement trigger s3resume
> > 
> > This is the equivalent of xm trigger s3resume and it is implemented the
> > same way: using an ACPI state change.
> 
> The code here is a bit odd - callers are apparently expected to pass
> strings rather than enums through into the libxl API.  I think
> trigger_type_from_string ought to be libxlu_...
> 
> But given the current code and the state of freeze we shouldn't do
> that now.
> 
> This is clearly a low-impact new feature and I'm inclined to make
> exception to the freeze for it.  Have you tested the patch ?  Anyone
> object ?

I forgot to reply to this, but yes I tested it.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>