Re: [Xen-devel] xl and GFX passthrough

[Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, 2011-01-13 at 09:12 +0000, Sergey Tovpeko wrote:
> diff --git a/tools/libxl/libxl.idl b/tools/libxl/libxl.idl
> index 81fcfd9..bf3c429 100644
> --- a/tools/libxl/libxl.idl
> +++ b/tools/libxl/libxl.idl
> @@ -96,6 +96,7 @@ libxl_domain_build_info =
> Struct("domain_build_info",[
>      ("disable_migrate", bool),
>      ("kernel",          libxl_file_reference),
>      ("cpuid",           libxl_cpuid_policy_list),
> +    ("gfx_passthru",    integer),
>      ("hvm",             integer),
>      ("u", KeyedUnion(None, "hvm",
>                  [("hvm", "%s", Struct(None,
> @@ -161,6 +162,7 @@ libxl_device_model_info =
> Struct("device_model_info",[
>      ("vcpu_avail",       integer,           False, "vcpus actually
> available"),
>      ("xen_platform_pci", integer,           False, "enable/disable
> the xen platform pci device"),
>      ("extra",            libxl_string_list, False, "extra parameters
> pass directly to qemu, NULL terminated"),
> +    ("gfx_passthru",     integer),
>      ],
>      comment=
>  """Device Model information. 

I think gfx_passthrough is actually a boolean, right? In that case it
should be declared as "bool" in the idl.

Ian.



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel