WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] XFS support for pygrub patch

To: Wouter D'Haeseleer <Wouter.DHaeseleer@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] XFS support for pygrub patch
From: Marco Nenciarini <marco.nenciarini@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 23:39:39 +0100
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 01:25:20 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <22752968ADD47840A7D404102C7563B005A82DE827@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <22752968ADD47840A7D404102C7563B005A82DE827@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101030 Icedove/3.0.10
On 08/12/2010 22:50, Wouter D'Haeseleer wrote:
> Hi Marco,
> 
> I'm struggling with the same issue as you had.
> Did you by any change compiled it for debian amd64 ?
> 
> I'm getting errors like:
> fsys_xfs.c:409: error: extended registers have no high halves
> 
> Any idea what I can do to solve it?
> 

I developed it on a CentOS, because I need it on a XCP server, and there
it works without problems.

I've just tried on a Debian unstable x86_64 and the problem is always
reproducible. Sincerely I have no idea on why it happens, but I've
discovered that turning off the optimization (with -O0) it compiles
without problems.

Maybe some gcc guru can suggest a better solution.

Regards,
Marco

-- 
Marco Nenciarini - System manager @ Devise.IT
marco.nenciarini@xxxxxxxxx | http://www.devise.it

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>