On Mon, 29 Nov 2010, Wei Wang2 wrote:
> On Monday 29 November 2010 16:49:05 Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > On Mon, 29 Nov 2010, Keir Fraser wrote:
> > > Stefano,
> > >
> > > Can you ack/nack this patch please.
> > ack.
> > I think we also need this:
> > diff -r 79b71c77907b xen/arch/x86/physdev.c
> > --- a/xen/arch/x86/physdev.c Wed Nov 24 10:20:03 2010 +0000
> > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/physdev.c Mon Nov 29 15:26:03 2010 +0000
> > @@ -236,7 +236,8 @@ static int physdev_unmap_pirq(struct phy
> > spin_lock(&d->event_lock);
> > ret = unmap_domain_pirq_emuirq(d, unmap->pirq);
> > spin_unlock(&d->event_lock);
> > - goto free_domain;
> > + if ( unmap->domid == DOMID_SELF || ret )
> > + goto free_domain;
> > }
> > ret = -EPERM;
> > Wei, could you give it a try, in addition to your patch?
> > Thanks,
> > Stefano
> Hi Stefano,
> This patch works well together with my patch on our testing system. No more
Keir, can you please apply both patches?
Xen-devel mailing list