This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Home Products Support Community News


Re: [Xen-devel] Re: XEN boot hangs at ACPI: PCI Root Bridge [PCI0] (0000

To: Neobiker <neo1106@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: XEN boot hangs at ACPI: PCI Root Bridge [PCI0] (0000:00)
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 11:49:30 -0500
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 08:51:46 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1289643274711-3263418.post@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <000001cb7530$d9a39ed0$8ceadc70$@de> <20101111161807.GA29365@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <1289495795203-3260687.post@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20101112221953.GB26189@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <1289643274711-3263418.post@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
> I know about the pci passthrough (of course), but my usb ports are all
> onboard and i have to connect the usb ports to different domains. So if i
> connect the usb controller to vdr domu, i possibly will miss the other usb
> ports for other domains... so pvusb works perfectly for my
> usb-to-multi-domain scenario.

> Are you interested in investigating the failure on the "old" kernel with
> another debug log?

Not really.. which is why I was hinting for you to try the PVOPS and PCI 

> I personally think it would be better to concentrate all developper
> capacitys in finishing the migration to the new pvops kernels and to
> complete all missing features ...  ;-) 
> Btw: Congratlations for the work done untill now !!

Thank you.
> Xen may be back to stay as a virtualisation standard if kernel 2.6.38 will
> be able to start as dom0 (as 2.6.37 will) and to be able to drive domUs
> (missing in upcoming 2.6.37). I think that's really really (!) important for
> XEN future. And: XEN 4.0.x must be as rock stable as 3.4.2 as soon as
> possible... i personnally don't think about using 4.0.x for production
> systems at this point...

Uh, even 4.0.1? What are the issues you are worried about?

Xen-devel mailing list