xen-devel

[Top] [All Lists]

[Xen-devel] Re: iPXE using 1.0.0-rc1 rather than 1.0.0?

from [Gianni Tedesco]

[Permanent Link][Original]

To:	Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	[Xen-devel] Re: iPXE using 1.0.0-rc1 rather than 1.0.0?
From:	Gianni Tedesco <gianni.tedesco@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Fri, 5 Nov 2010 14:23:47 +0000
Cc:	"xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date:	Fri, 05 Nov 2010 07:24:44 -0700
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<4CD3D2EA0200007800020B1F@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References:	<4CD3D2EA0200007800020B1F@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

On Fri, 2010-11-05 at 08:48 +0000, Jan Beulich wrote:
> What is the reason for not using the final version?

Uhm, It got sorted as being after v1.0.0-rc1 in the output of git tag
and I didn't see it!

Not the best of reasons...

Keir? :)

diff -r 0d5f09e3728c tools/firmware/etherboot/Makefile
--- a/tools/firmware/etherboot/Makefile Thu Nov 04 16:42:34 2010 +0000
+++ b/tools/firmware/etherboot/Makefile Fri Nov 05 14:22:07 2010 +0000
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ else
 IPXE_GIT_URL := git://git.ipxe.org/ipxe.git
 endif
 
-IPXE_GIT_TAG := v1.0.0-rc1
+IPXE_GIT_TAG := v1.0.0
 
 D=ipxe
 T=ipxe-git-snapshot.tar.gz



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[Xen-devel] iPXE using 1.0.0-rc1 rather than 1.0.0?, Jan Beulich [Xen-devel] Re: iPXE using 1.0.0-rc1 rather than 1.0.0?, Gianni Tedesco <=

Previous by Date:	Re: [Xen-devel] create shadow pages, Tim Deegan
Next by Date:	[Xen-devel] libxl: build fix, Christoph Egger
Previous by Thread:	[Xen-devel] iPXE using 1.0.0-rc1 rather than 1.0.0?, Jan Beulich
Next by Thread:	[Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86-64: more fixes for Fam10 MMCONF enabling, Jan Beulich
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]