Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 2477: regressions - FAIL

[Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, 2010-11-01 at 13:48 +0000, Keir Fraser wrote:
> On 01/11/2010 13:26, "Ian Campbell" <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> >> tests which did not succeed:
> >>  test-amd64-amd64-win          6 windows-install            fail REGR. vs.
> >> 2449
> >>  test-amd64-i386-win           6 windows-install            fail REGR. vs.
> >> 2449
> >>  test-amd64-xcpkern-i386-win   6 windows-install            fail REGR. vs.
> >> 2449
> >>  test-i386-i386-win            6 windows-install            fail REGR. vs.
> >> 2449
> >>  test-i386-xcpkern-i386-win    6 windows-install            fail REGR. vs.
> >> 2449
> > 
> > Windows setup is hanging at "Setup is starting windows" as per attached
> > (admittedly not very informative) screenshot.
> > 
> > Bisect seems to blame this changeset:
> > 
> > changeset:   22339:6fae4331d5aa
> 
> Yeah, change in public headers broke old firmware/qemu. I'll fix it up.

Thanks. 

On the read side of handle_evt_io there is:
        data >>= 8 * (port - PM1a_STS_ADDR);
should that not be PM1a_STS_ADDR_OLD in some cases?

Ian.



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel