WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH]: libxl: fix dom0 minimum memory threshold check

To: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Gianni Tedesco <gianni.tedesco@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH]: libxl: fix dom0 minimum memory threshold check [and 1 more messages]
From: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 12:02:51 +0100
Cc: Xen Devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 04:04:02 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1287752246.12843.4400.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <alpine.DEB.2.00.1010221503050.10348@kaball-desktop>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Newsgroups: chiark.mail.xen.devel
References: <1287752246.12843.4400.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1010221503050.10348@kaball-desktop>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Gianni Tedesco writes ("[Xen-devel] [PATCH]: libxl: fix dom0 minimum memory 
threshold check"):
> libxl_set_memory_target tries to set the memory target for a given
> domain to new_target_memkb. The function includes a check to make sure
> that dom0's memory is not reduced below a minimal threshold ie.
> LIBXL_MIN_DOM0_MEM. However, this check is performed before the
> new_target_memkb variable is properly initialised - when the value is
> always zero. This means that the check always fails. Fix this by moving
> the test to happen after the proper initialisation of new_target_memkb.

Applied, thanks.

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>