This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Home Products Support Community News


RE: [Xen-devel] Re: VM hung after running sometime

Well, I just go throught the source of irqbalance, it shows that it balances the irq through
updating /proc/irq/$irq/smp_affinity.  That, in my understanding, set irq affinity is almost
equal to irq migration.
I later find the NIC  interrupt is not modified in dom0, so it is safe to set its  affinity, 
but  interrupt of xen event use handle_level_irq, set its affinity will subject to irq
Am I right?
> Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 10:07:28 -0700
> From: jeremy@xxxxxxxx
> To: tinnycloud@xxxxxxxxxxx
> CC: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: VM hung after running sometime
> On 09/28/2010 04:23 AM, MaoXiaoyun wrote:
> >
> > Is it safe to set irq affinity(including NIC, domain event, etc) manually?
> > Will it cause irq lost?
> There's only a very small chance of a lost interrupt, especially if the
> device is mostly idle at the time. The event can only be lost if:
> 1. it is handling a device interrupt
> 2. you migrate it to another cpu
> 3. another interrupt comes in before the first one has finished
> processing
> J
Xen-devel mailing list