This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Home Products Support Community News


Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 00 of 24] [RFC] libxc: hypercall buffers

To: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 00 of 24] [RFC] libxc: hypercall buffers
From: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2010 17:36:53 +0100
Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Tue, 07 Sep 2010 09:39:06 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <19590.27106.602612.639069@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: Citrix Systems, Inc.
References: <patchbomb.1283780300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <19590.27106.602612.639069@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Tue, 2010-09-07 at 17:35 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Ian Campbell writes ("[Xen-devel] [PATCH 00 of 24] [RFC] libxc: hypercall 
> buffers"):
> > This RFC series only partially translates over to the the new
> > scheme. It is intended that the final series end with a patch which
> > effectively does s/xc_set_xen_guest_handle/set_xen_guest_handle/g in
> > order to catch future errors (it should also remove the now redundant
> > hcall_buf_prep and hcall_buf_release calls and assiciated
> > infrastructure).
> This seems like a good idea.  Some of the early parts of your series
> should probably go in right away, as they're just bugfixes, right ?

Yes, although I probably need to just double check they are sane and/or
don't rely on later patches for correctness...

Xen-devel mailing list