This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Home Products Support Community News


Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.0-testing test] 2061: regressions - FAIL

On Friday, 03 September 2010 at 18:41, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Brendan Cully writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.0-testing test] 2061: 
> regressions - FAIL"):
> > Or, instead of removing features, maybe your test scripts could just
> > not use -j4, or explicitly build the kernel first, until Jeremy gets
> > around to doing the merge?
> Not using -j4 is out of the question.  And I don't want to make the
> situation with building kernels out of the xen tree in my test system
> any worse than it is already.  I'm intending to get rid of that
> entirely.  Hopefully we can get rid of it in xen-unstable at some
> point too.

Until the kernel modules are in their proper place, I think a less
drastic fix for your test suites would be to edit
tools/remus/kmod/Makefile and change

test -d $(KERNELDIR)


test -f $(KERNELDIR)/Module.symvers

which will still silently fail to build the modules if tools/remus
builds too early, but should suppress failure warnings. Completely

Xen-devel mailing list