This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Home Products Support Community News


Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3 of 8] libxl: adds few more memory operations

To: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3 of 8] libxl: adds few more memory operations
From: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2010 12:36:15 +0100
Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Wed, 01 Sep 2010 04:37:07 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <19581.15271.762595.938126@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1008271215440.2545@kaball-desktop> <19581.15271.762595.938126@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23)
On Tue, 31 Aug 2010, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Stefano Stabellini writes ("[Xen-devel] [PATCH 3 of 8] libxl: adds few more 
> memory operations"):
> > libxl: adds few more memory operations
> These need to come with a comprehensive explanation of what these
> various memory values are and how it's supposed to work.  Probably in
> the form of a comment in libxl.h.

Yes, I'll do that.

> > libxl_get_free_memory_slack: calculate the amount of memory that should
> > be left free in the system and write it on xenstore.
> In particular, the purpose of this is rather opaque.  Is it really
> something we should be exposing ?
No, I'll make it static.

Xen-devel mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3 of 8] libxl: adds few more memory operations, Stefano Stabellini <=