WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.0-testing test] 2032: regressions - FAIL

To: Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.0-testing test] 2032: regressions - FAIL
From: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 09:00:45 +0100
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 01:01:54 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <C8929F09.1E73C%keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: Citrix Systems, Inc.
References: <C8929F09.1E73C%keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Thu, 2010-08-19 at 08:42 +0100, Keir Fraser wrote:
> This looks more like the switch to xen/stable-2.6.32.x branch is to blame?
> Seeing as the baseline is immediately before that switch.
> 
> Is there a known-good changeset in the branch that we could try testing
> against?

I think we should try e6b9b2cbca5093e8e38d3e314e2f6415ad951c60. This is
the commit before e73f4955a821f850f5b88c32d12a81714523a95f which was
fingered as bad by the xen-unstable bisect yesterday.

e73f4 is the merge of 2.6.32.19, e6b9b is the merge of 2.6.32.18, there
are no proper xen.git changesets between the two -- only the contents of
2.6.32.19, which does include some Xen save/restore "fixes".

I'm still trying to repro in my environment but I think it likely that
either those fixes made something worse for configurations other than
the ones I test with (I'm going to pull in Ian's config) or that they
backported to 2.6.32 badly.

IanJ: Are the guest consoles logged anywhere by your test suite? If not
then could you apply this (perhaps to /etc/sysconfig/xencommons after
install rather than to the source tree) and
collect /var/log/xen/console.

diff -r e898a4d74a21 -r da1648640fd9 
tools/hotplug/Linux/init.d/sysconfig.xencommons
--- a/tools/hotplug/Linux/init.d/sysconfig.xencommons   Wed Aug 18 13:14:57 
2010 +0100
+++ b/tools/hotplug/Linux/init.d/sysconfig.xencommons   Wed Aug 18 13:14:57 
2010 +0100
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 # Log xenconsoled messages (cf xl dmesg)
-#XENCONSOLED_TRACE=[none|guest|hv|all]
+XENCONSOLED_TRACE=guest
 
 # Log xenstored messages
 #XENSTORED_TRACE=[yes|on|1]

Thanks,
Ian.



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel