WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] S3 sleep in dom0 breaks dom0<->domU wallclock synchroniz

To: Joanna Rutkowska <joanna@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] S3 sleep in dom0 breaks dom0<->domU wallclock synchronization
From: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2010 13:50:29 +0100
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <Jeremy.Fitzhardinge@xxxxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Rafal Wojtczuk <rafal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Tue, 06 Jul 2010 05:51:26 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4C33051B.30109@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: Acsc9eyr46O3IRvHROGZCjCaMQLt8AAE+M4s
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] S3 sleep in dom0 breaks dom0<->domU wallclock synchronization
User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.24.0.100205
On 06/07/2010 11:27, "Joanna Rutkowska" <joanna@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

>> Wouldn't it be much simpler to not introduce any new logic at all and
>> just let Dom0 tools/scripts take care of properly suspending
>> (checkpointing) all (minimally all pv, but I would really think treating
>> different kinds of guests differently here is unnecessary) guests
>> before doing a host suspend, as Jeremy had suggested in an earlier
>> reply?
>> 
> 
> But wouldn't this require dumping all the VMs memory do disk? Can we use
> xm pause instead, i.e. will it notify VMs properly?

It just requires the guests to be put through a guest-side suspend/resume
cycle. The usual tools-side work of saving to disk etc could be elided. Yes,
it probably makes sense to extend that existing mechanism to include S3 as
well. Just needs someone to do the work. :-)

 -- Keir



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>