WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0 of 6] PV on HVM Xen

To: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0 of 6] PV on HVM Xen
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 16:43:15 -0700
Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 16:45:05 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1004221519440.11380@kaball-desktop>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1004221519440.11380@kaball-desktop>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100330 Fedora/3.0.4-1.fc12 Lightning/1.0b2pre Thunderbird/3.0.4
On 04/22/2010 08:15 AM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> Hi all,
> this is an incremental update on my last PV on HVM series, including
> many bug fixes.
>   

Thanks!

> In particular multivcpu guests, suspend\resume, the unplug of
> emulate devices and receving evtchns as interrupts from the platform pci
> device should all work correctly now.
> However the new pv clocksource is still missing, and also I left the
> xen_guest_init code in enlighten.c for the moment.
>
> This series is based on Jeremy's pvops kernel tree, branch name
> stable-2.6.33.x.
>   

I still prefer patches to be based on an upstream kernel version if at
all possible (ideally 2.6.32).  If you depend on something that's not in
mainline, then merge the specific branch for that feature into your
pvhvm branch (IOW, it would help if you used a git-based workflow).

I'll try and fix this up in the meantime and see how it looks.

Thanks,
    J

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>