WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] xenoprof passive mode overhead

To: Ya-Yunn Su <yayunn.su@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] xenoprof passive mode overhead
From: Dulloor <dulloor@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 13:32:01 -0400
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 11:17:48 -0700
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:received:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=DjbNwCX3FZtNOpx2LZqKaqyVKVnmtMCyP//Ymk4n5vY=; b=FhHMyEbWUXwVsDS7D37LuJuBdzpWQ3an0MmVnLNeaQAgKXUotQWZw1z692amnuxiUU xcvOizvCJUGdKnG4gOLmGXDySmRttK8gULt2ye68cqTnMeIVA5VxAJsMq7NtKXNoeNDB Z2pDsUpt7AyconcRbIoK5zyb7+jPfWAoQxBSM=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=wQ6JLVNqUFh2Um75jYX9+V4CSX42cnJXkCs3ezLKHhfklkuIq3+6iEfLxWvPHpRgVE 3znHApDCpjzHBeB3NRE8jQQCeRMkLuN9FNSZzrApZaPueFRdLrxaHipBPA0g1WWHbbfs j+S3YxZGPnEzPP5KWqt4kLXCZM5JlBx7+mpPQ=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <a86c569d1003251106j3a61b2d5pe77332160d2f0302@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <a86c569d1003251106j3a61b2d5pe77332160d2f0302@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
If you use a very low threshold for triggering events, the overhead
would be more. Looks like thats the case with you.

-dulloor

On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 2:06 PM, Ya-Yunn Su <yayunn.su@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi all,
>  I'd like to use xenoprof passive mode on domain-0 to calculate L2
> cache missed for each guest domain.  I setup oprofile daemon as
> followed
>
> opcontrol --start-daemon --event=LLC_MISSES:4000
> --xen=/boot/xen-3.4.2.gz
> --vmlinux=/scratch/xen-3.4.2/build-linux-2.6.18-lttng-xen0_x86_32/vmlinux
> --passive-domains=1,2
> --passive-images=/scratch/xen-3.4.0/build-linux-2.6.18-xenU_x86_32/vmlinux,/scratch/xen-3.4.0/build-linux-2.6.18-xenU_x86_32/vmlinux
>
> My machine has two cores and I pinned domain-0 to one core and guest
> domains to the other.  When I ran oprofile to calculate cache
> misses/sec every 5 seconds on domain 0, I noticed that the transient
> CPU utilization can be as high as 30%.  This affects the performance
> of whatever benchmark I'm running in the guest domain.  Is this 30%
> overhead for domain-0 common or am I doing something obviously wrong?
> Any suggestion is appreciated.
>
> Thank you,
> Ya-Yunn
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>