 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-devel
RE: [Xen-devel] RE: "monitor"-ed address and IPI reduction
Keir Fraser wrote: > On 10/03/2010 05:09, "Wei, Gang" <gang.wei@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> I agree that we can have a try on this. Waking up cpu by mem write >>> should be more efficient for monitor/mwait case. >> >> Here is a patch to monitor "sortirq_pending" instead of "current". >> The IPI reduction part may be a bit complex, can we hold it for >> post-4.0? > > This whole thing is for post 4.0 now. That's fine. Jimmy _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: [konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1 of 1] Intel VT-D: Don't turn x2APIC if there is a missing DRHD entry for the IOAPIC], Zhang, Xiantao |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Xen-devel] pvops-2.6.32 - Interrupt routing problem, Bastian Blank |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] RE: "monitor"-ed address and IPI reduction, Keir Fraser |
| Next by Thread: | [Xen-devel] [PATCH] hvm: correct time offset update in RTC write emulation, Ian Campbell |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
