WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] RE: tmem - really default to on?

To: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-devel] RE: tmem - really default to on?
From: Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2010 07:43:11 -0800 (PST)
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Tue, 09 Feb 2010 07:43:59 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <C796DBA8.98C0%keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <4B713819020000780002E682@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx C796DBA8.98C0%keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Keir Fraser [mailto:keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 09, 2010 2:30 AM
> To: Jan Beulich; Dan Magenheimer
> Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: tmem - really default to on?
> 
> On 09/02/2010 09:25, "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> >> Oops, I see in re-reading your earlier posts that you
> >> are enabling it by default for domU as well.  In that
> >> case I agree, sadly, that your best choice might be to
> >> disable tmem completely in your Xen hypervisor, at least
> >> until the Xen fragmentation issues are resolved.
> >
> > And why would that not hold for the upstream version? That's what
> > the mail thread was about - whether for 4.0 defaulting tmem to on
> > should be reverted. I hence take your above statement as a 'yes'
> > to that question. Keir, will you do this then, or should I submit a
> > revert patch?
> 
> Yes, I can do it. It's a shame though.
> 
>  -- Keir

Yes, I agree as long as we are just flipping the default to off.
Turning tmem on by default served its purpose of shaking out other
problems, but unfortunately too late in the 4.0 release cycle to
fix them all in time for the 4.0 release.

Keir, please revert 20655/20758.  Ideally, I'd like to
see the default flipped back to ON in xen-unstable immediately
after 4.0 is split off.

(And, for the record, tmem is still IN the 4.0 release,
it just needs to be explicitly enabled to use it and
has some known bugs.)

Dan

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel