WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel][Pv-ops][PATCH] Netback multiple tasklet support

To: "Ian Campbell" <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel][Pv-ops][PATCH] Netback multiple tasklet support
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 10:17:18 +0000
Cc: Steven Smith <Steven.Smith@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ian Pratt <Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>, Dongxiao Xu <dongxiao.xu@xxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 02:17:42 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1260436078.23698.45463.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <EADF0A36011179459010BDF5142A457501D006B913@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4FA716B1526C7C4DB0375C6DADBC4EA342A7A7E951@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <EADF0A36011179459010BDF5142A457501D006BBAC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4FA716B1526C7C4DB0375C6DADBC4EA342A7A7E95E@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <EADF0A36011179459010BDF5142A457501D11C1BE3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4B182D87.6030901@xxxxxxxx> <EADF0A36011179459010BDF5142A457501D11C20F8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4B187513.80003@xxxxxxxx> <EADF0A36011179459010BDF5142A457501D13FDE62@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4B200727.8040000@xxxxxxxx> <1260436078.23698.45463.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx> 10.12.09 10:07 >>>
>Subject: xen: ensure locking gnttab_copy_grant_page is safe against interrupts.
>
>Now that netback processing occurs in a thread instead of a tasklet
>gnttab_copy_grant_page needs to be safe against interrupts.
>
>The code is currently commented out in this tree but on 2.6.18 we observed a
>deadlock where the netback thread called gnttab_copy_grant_page, locked
>gnttab_dma_lock for writing, was interrupted and on return from interrupt the
>network stack's TX tasklet ended up calling __gnttab_dma_map_page via the
>hardware driver->swiotlb and tries to take gnttab_dma_lock for reading.
>
>Correct the commented code so we don't get bitten if/when it is re-enabled.

Wouldn't safe-against-softirq be sufficient then? Or if not (i.e. if meant
to be generic), wouldn't the irq-safe variant need to be used
independent of the new feature (and then also in the 2.6.18 tree)?

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>