 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-devel
[Xen-users] Will pv-ops dom0-patched kernel be eventually merged into Li
| To: | xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [Xen-users] Will pv-ops dom0-patched kernel be eventually merged into Linus Torvalds' mainline Linux kernel tree? |
| From: | "Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming)" <space.time.universe@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 10 Nov 2009 13:29:00 +0800 |
| Cc: | space.time.universe@xxxxxxxxx |
| Delivery-date: | Mon, 09 Nov 2009 21:29:58 -0800 |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=K8GG38YZ3/0vxrzQhfWTCNalKTBwzZ+YpVocTFFMHpg=; b=vy1I1QY0EFnwWFJMI0ExkCG0jX15xhZ+aPsePpJfJflj6WvshIoyOKBY7tFKkpjXcq 7KfUJglRIWWb1qLAFjAmz7OqDSwWOfCfIWo/bq67qo49+GlfWmCY8XjYekYl7vp1se4C Eb1L72r9dL/GUbH/SUX9CWbC9U6D8ZxZJ2qWc= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=OQJ98j2uj/SQAJWLBdZDMGlGx56DjGGLFvOUZkopr9q6aWDRWKnkDF7AGzIeGyAXMT HnRdLg4cGuhw0Dp4mSk7Zos0Mpz4hqXH9fXJW54UWw4pD8MK4PTQCznG6O6D6mkGRHyC rV1rf0/UhwVTLgw9c/zefR5WXw4W9KZAD6REI= |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| Sender: | xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|
After reading the following articles, it doesn't sound very hopeful for Xen. [1] Xen vs. KVM: Verdict still out on dueling hypervisors http://searchdatacenter.techtarget.com/news/article/0,289142,sid80_gci1368664,00.html [2] Xen vs. KVM Linux virtualization hypervisors http://searchservervirtualization.techtarget.com/generic/0,295582,sid94_gci1371226,00.html [3] Xen vs. KVM: The Linux Foundation’s Small-Minded View of Virtualization http://windowsconnected.com/blogs/brad/archive/2009/04/17/xen-vs-kvm-the-linux-foundation-s-small-minded-view-of-virtualization.aspx What are your views? I certainly hope that pvops dom0 patches would be merged into the mainline Linux kernel. -- Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) Dip(Mechatronics) BEng(Hons)(Mechanical Engineering) Alma Maters: (1) Singapore Polytechnic (2) National University of Singapore My Primary Blog: http://teo-en-ming-aka-zhang-enming.blogspot.com My Secondary Blog: http://enmingteo.wordpress.com My Youtube videos: http://www.youtube.com/user/enmingteo Email: space.time.universe@xxxxxxxxx Mobile Phone (Starhub Prepaid): +65-8369-2618 Street: Bedok Reservoir Road Country: Singapore _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Xen-devel] VM_FOREIGN could be set into direct_remap_pfn_range()?, Wei Kong |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Xen-devel] Failed to reboot Dom0 kernel because of segfault, Sun Shuchun |
| Previous by Thread: | [Xen-devel] VM_FOREIGN could be set into direct_remap_pfn_range()?, Wei Kong |
| Next by Thread: | [Xen-devel] Re: Will pv-ops dom0-patched kernel be eventually merged into Linus Torvalds' mainline Linux kernel tree?, Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
