| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] Re: Request for backport of 82599 quirks to 3.4.2
Rose, Gregory V writes ("Request for backport of 82599 quirks to 3.4.2"):
> commit a77dc89dde1b8b9331c0f746e34389d6a253755f
> Author: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Tue Aug 4 15:28:14 2009 +0100
>
> passthrough: support the assignment of the VF of Intel 82599 10GbE
> Controlle
If I remember rightly this was a quirk of this particular card. I'd
be quite fine with putting that in the 3.4.x branch.
Just so we are clear: these two backports both serve the same purpose
but as far as I can tell having either of them separately is no worse
than having neither ? So there's no need to coordinate the change
across the trees ?
Thanks,
Ian.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
| |
|
Home