WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] About xen bridge

To: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Xen-devel] About xen bridge
From: Fasiha Ashraf <feehapk@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 12:26:29 +0530 (IST)
Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 23:56:59 -0700
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.co.in; s=s1024; t=1254120989; bh=CsWYI2YxbWbSmLAqtweUlAeOypmKP8jnawJievtEVgA=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=vbR7kqrII0Wa5wag4ZCgrkpt2M08clDnhj4vY7OSNEL56yeAgjBmOTbbNyHvlNdYRgU8Lp5YEj3dxUY0rcZ0OOihMNOrfKydS/CdvUeEOwKH8nS8jJyYj8H54hAMhezVwLW/EkRz127bNGKgDCy9aI2LPfGTQwbRC2+EgKQcAuk=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.co.in; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=0EhZSifoXY30S1wCviIhRgPPVea+p8OvkzG0ISerAidTXmd5B0Bebl0nrxxA3rav9DVicG/nnqreoeoDHfURrKhErBQv3YESbjPBEG4Vu7Ghfu5wVyk2TgRzWOzcLKYYAbmvfcJVX8c6nisb9eKc98JHKQylYVWCCdDijL6gy10=;
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Hi there,
I am using xen hypervisor for analysing guest to guest communication throughput. I have Quad Core Intel Xeon server with F11 installed on it.
My Dom0 and DomU specs are:
Dom0: #uname -ra
Linux HPCNL-SR-2 2.6.30-rc6-tip #1 SMP Tue Aug 25 12:26:16 PKST 2009 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
DomU: # uname -ra
Linux F11-G5S2 2.6.29.4-167.fc11.i686.PAE #1 SMP Wed May 27 17:28:22 EDT 2009 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
while running netperf benchmark I have got such results in different cases
DomU to Dom0     2000 to 3000Mbps
Dom0 to DomU     also ok
But in case of DomU to DomU throughput is around 0.14 to 0.29 Mbps
I have found these warnings in my log files

/var/log/xen/dom1
domid: 6
Warning: vlan 0 is not connected to host network
qemu: ignoring not-understood drive `sda2'
Watching /local/domain/0/device-model/6/logdirty/next-active
Watching /local/domain/0/device-model/6/command
char device redirected to /dev/pts/4
/usr/src/xen-3.4-testing.hg/tools/ioemu-dir/hw/xen_blktap.c:628: Init blktap pipes
xs_read(): vncpasswd get error. /vm/fb477f56-bb98-c144-54a4-74dd4379b094/vncpasswd.

Also  dom0 file /var/log/messages contains
Sep 14 14:37:10 HPCNL-SR-2 logger: /etc/xen/scripts/vif-bridge: iptables setup failed. This may affect guest networking.
Is there any iptable issue in this case I have tried it after flushing all iptables but no use.
Doing all in bridge mode of communication. Kindly help me identifying and the resolving the issue.

Also please explain me Why in the newer versions there is no vif0.0 for dom0? As said in running xen book "Herbert Xu has proposed a patch that removes the need for this loopback device. In the future, there may be no more Xen loop device in bridging mode"
In Domain0, backend vif0.0 is called the Xen loopback (or netloop) device. Its function is different from the guest domain's vif because the guest domain frontend vif passes the packets in the guest domain to its proxy backend in the driver domain (often Domain0). The Xen loopback device vif0.0 exists only to enforce a data copy on the guest domain to Domain0 path. The copy is desired because otherwise a packet sitting on the Domain0 receiving buffer would hold the guest domain's page containing the packet for an unbounded amount of time. There is no guarantee of when the user process will read the data and free the socket buffer.I would like to add one more thing in your knowledge that in my case guest to internet speed is ok. wget between guests shows 35K/s to the max.and the throughput in this case is 35.1K/s  eta 4h 3m
In xen 3.4 how are they managing this packet sitting on the dom0 receiving buffer for unbounded time?

Regards,
Fasiha


Keep up with people you care about with Yahoo! India Mail. Learn how.


Keep up with people you care about with Yahoo! India Mail. Learn how.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [Xen-devel] About xen bridge, Fasiha Ashraf <=