WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen/xsm/flask: Update to policy.24

To: Stephen Smalley <sds@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Xen <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen/xsm/flask: Update to policy.24
From: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 13:10:31 +0100
Cc: "George S. Coker, II" <gscoker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 05:11:14 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1250604863.3629.231.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcogDd4PBLk/qyx3T1GPLt4WwOEDNQAuC3rw
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen/xsm/flask: Update to policy.24
User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.20.0.090605
On 18/08/2009 15:14, "Stephen Smalley" <sds@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Update Xen Flask module to policy.24.
> This is a back-port of the latest SELinux code to Xen, adjusted
> for Xen coding style and interfaces.  Unneeded functionality such
> as most object context config data, handle_unknown, MLS field defaulting,
> etc has been omitted.
> 
> Signed-off-by:  Stephen D. Smalley <sds@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: George S. Coker, II <gscoker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

The patch didn't apply. Given that the affected source files have a thick
layer of dust on them, it is probably because the patch got mangled somehow.
Try re-sending as an attachment.

 -- Keir



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>