WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] Strange network behaviour

To: Marco Tizzoni <marco.tizzoni@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Strange network behaviour
From: George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 15:15:28 +0100
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 07:15:51 -0700
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=f+2suM1JayDsCr6/EmT2+VVP2D/123f8dkerjB3g/BI=; b=QB3mtJCunFM4ryNpP4oXx4HR0dV7kTbVa1OK9QDoJ9AYCGKOqO3xE+ma+247J4F+4u 2uc4Sm/xKNVT4zOUnOLptPN9h7Dfk56K+cW3GPXzNUrsSTxIYiXi6Xa4MnL0SzRU+89m 0uJRciWQeVvlhlsPAMuI72NqGBFkDDm4Qmemc=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=jAO3RkSyzW4w82qItvfVfQMjNF0xQaBmFVbiNa7xNu8XmDJiihm1UDfHRL4KZLSNhJ orKQr1dt5ZELMROeF62kvbXMd2XFHoRVoChqFFs82Ae0qscu6P7Hq4GRrGgLr/jmrIlu bTvFUZ/SXWsi53EVfMmEkL8FUJmG+pco0T9uM=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <f9611b0f0907280709i36658164s116bb14e71d90e04@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <f9611b0f0907280121r271078fci35ed52d0ff955d9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <de76405a0907280603j7b83a791rbcd66f3567b604e5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <f9611b0f0907280709i36658164s116bb14e71d90e04@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
That's a difference of only 0.5%.  It is interesting that it's
bi-modal, but I don't think it's very significant.  If you're really
keen to just understand where that comes from, you can try taking a
trace and analyzing the results.

 -George

On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 3:09 PM, Marco Tizzoni<marco.tizzoni@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 3:03 PM, George
> Dunlap<George.Dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> What's the granularity of your measurement?
>
> I use tcpdump/tshark to dump e decode incoming packets and I think it
> uses the timestamp from the nic.
> The two gaps are 0.011781 and 0.011731 and they remain constant over
> the time. This is a snap:
>
> # Order  AbsoluteTime  DeltaTime
> 1 0.000000 0.000000
> 2 0.009734 0.009734
> 3 0.021515 0.011781
> 4 0.033245 0.011730
> 5 0.045027 0.011782
> 6 0.056757 0.011730
> 7 0.068538 0.011781
> 8 0.080269 0.011731
> 9 0.092050 0.011781
> 10 0.103831 0.011781
> 11 0.115562 0.011731
> 12 0.127342 0.011780
> 13 0.139073 0.011731
>
>
> Attached a decoded dump of 10 seconds with arrival order, absolute
> time, relative time.
> Also you can find a graph where this issue is clear.
>
> Thanks,
> Marco
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>
>

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>