WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] Re: How is the virt_hv_start_low used in compatible guest

To: "Yunhong Jiang" <yunhong.jiang@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-devel] Re: How is the virt_hv_start_low used in compatible guest
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2009 10:54:38 +0100
Cc: Xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Mon, 06 Jul 2009 02:55:10 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <E2263E4A5B2284449EEBD0AAB751098402CD08E6C5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <E2263E4A5B2284449EEBD0AAB751098402CD08E6C5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
The guest can (and is actually doing so in the Dom0 case) make use of this e.g. 
for setting the low/highmem boundary at a higher address, thus increasing the 
amount of lowmem over what that would be on a 32-bit hypervisor. For DomU-s to 
also benefit, the tools would need to be adjusted, but as this can affect where 
a guest can be migrated to, so far it didn't seem worthwhile for anybody to 
actually implement this.

Jan

>>> "Jiang, Yunhong" <yunhong.jiang@xxxxxxxxx> 06.07.09 11:20 >>>
Jan/Keir, I have a question to followin code In arch/x86/domain_build.c. Can 
you share me why we need to make the virt_start be adjustable based on the 
memory size in the system? Per my understanding, these changes will only affect 
HV itself, but I didn't see much benifit. Or did I missed anything?

Thanks
Yunhong Jiang

    if ( (parms.virt_hv_start_low != UNSET_ADDR) && elf_32bit(&elf) )
    {
        unsigned long mask = (1UL << L2_PAGETABLE_SHIFT) - 1;
        value = (parms.virt_hv_start_low + mask) & ~mask;
        BUG_ON(!is_pv_32bit_domain(d));
#if defined(__i386__)
        if ( value > HYPERVISOR_VIRT_START )
            panic("Domain 0 expects too high a hypervisor start address.\n");
#else
        if ( value > __HYPERVISOR_COMPAT_VIRT_START )
            panic("Domain 0 expects too high a hypervisor start address.\n");
        HYPERVISOR_COMPAT_VIRT_START(d) =
            max_t(unsigned int, m2p_compat_vstart, value);
#endif
    }


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>