On 29/04/2009 17:50, "Dan Magenheimer" <
dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Since I see you are still taking boot-option patches
> for 3.4, I thought I'd retry this one which optionally
> measures cycles spent in each irq. I thought
> you had just decided it was too late for 3.4... if
> you rejected it for another reason, please let me
> know.
I don't think it has sufficient general utility to be applied. Anyone who